A blogger described herself with an enneagram number. I'd never heard of it...and down the rabbit hole I went.
In my immersive journalism pretentions, not only did I look it up, but took one of them. (I was bored). I was not concerned about any data they could use, took precautions and looked for a free test with free results.
It's a personality test, allegedly used by companies to hire people or blah blah blah. The test claims to have been put together by psychologists. Two hundred questions, very basic preferences; "when there's a deadline do you prefer perfectionism to team work" or "do you like helping others" etc.
Half way through, I realized that it was biased self reporting with some questions that offered no possibility to answer accurately.
The made up example that I'll use:
When you drink Acai berry juice, do you prefer it sweet or tart?
I've never had Acai berry juice.
No option to skip it or choose not applicable because it it was a strongly agree/disagree/sometimes response.
Poorly designed unscientific questionnaire. Then I got a number for my personality and the free result printout would be 99 dollars for a limited time.
Looked it up elsewhere. Basically the same grift as psychics. It told me what I already knew because I had told it what I already knew about myself. The rest was wrong.
Psychics do the same. Everytime I watched van Praagh, (he's been debunked), it's mostly cold readings. But he comforts his subjects, so I can understand the appeal.
Ah well.
Where I recently got confused, including this type of test, is the redefinition of introvert vs. extrovert. I think it's a label that limits and doesn't take into consideration that people change over time.
The test wasn't clear on work vs leisure. The behavior is quite different in each scenario. It also kept guiding the subject into either/or answers.
Not an insightful or useful test.





