I always knew that I didn't want to be an artist as a profession but that it had to be a part of my professional life. When I chose to apply to art college I knew that it was only to learn the techniques to be a fine artist, purely representational realism.
As with many things in my life I did it differently; parallel to high school and then completed overlapping with my science degrees. I was busy but happy and did it as a teen with special permission. I was talented and mature and I think they realized that. All of my courses were weekends, evenings or in the summer.
Back then there was no youtube, I had no portfolio admission mentor I didn't know what to submit. The essay part was easy but which 30 pieces which sketchbooks should I submit what were they looking for. I had no idea. Creative and innovative meant nothing and my range was so very limited; animals plants wildlife and I did not want to do anything else. I was not interested in sculpture or design. I did need to learn how to avoid bird on a branch floating on white paper (fine for scientific illustration).
![]() |
| Not me. But I like the image. |
My art teacher in high school was not a pleasant person. The wonderful previous one had retired. She had her favorites and only supported the expressionism/emotional art work of the students who were applying to places like Julliard and who wanted to be full time artists exploring the depths of the human soul while I wanted to paint an apple you could pick off the canvas and bite into.
My parents supported their Renaissance kid within reason. My budget was limited. I found out that I should have a cohesive presentation, mount it on foamboard (didn't know what that was or how to do it), attach labels (someone showed me some used in photography) but without someone showing me, I was winging it on my own.
I went to the art store attached to the art college and got very good advice as all the staff are art students themselves. The cost was prohibitive, spending money on supplies and Mi-teintes paper is one thing, wasting it on presentation materials another.
![]() |
| Also not me but what the portfolio looks like |
So black cardboard to mount. Instead of a professional architectural (poster tube) carrier I used the very sturdy (shipping) card board roll the Art paper was rolled up in. Instead of special adhesive, double sided removable painters tape and photo corners to mount. I bought a very large portfolio leather holder with handles that would fit all sizes of paper. (And that was sturdy enough to hold framed work). Everything looked hodge podge and amateurish to my eye.
The interview
Was three hours. With an admission panel of three art instructors. I had waited in the hallway and felt out of place. Everyone was artistic looking. Their presentations professional looking. Everyone had a portfolio document map, which I didn't. All my art work was loose in my portfolio carrier. My work was critiqued in the three hours which I really appreciated.
All of my linocut prints and everything that I did in high school didn't even receive a comment. They were interested in what I'd done at home. She wanted to see my sketch books. I had brought several. There weren't enough studies I was told. My photorealism (perfect copy) also no comment. She really liked three parrots I had drawn from photographs. You're very talented was high praise. This is were you need to continue. What surprised me was the piece I had thrown in at the last minute. It was a panoramic view of a harbor. I had lined up the image of about 10 photographs, they overlapped perfectly, but the actual rectangular squares did not. It was the piece she like the most.
It was the most relaxed interview I ever had. Mostly because I knew I was going to University. Not sure if it was standard, but they told me on the spot that I was admitted.




