DNA and Genomics.The basics.

 This is a very superficial but hopefully easy to understand post on DNa and genomics.

My analogy: Scientific research is like Hogwarths stairs. The goal is to get to the top (and discover something). You start on the staircase of those before you. Sometimes the staircase moves in the wrong direction, sometimes it goes nowhere, sometimes you have to start from the beginning and climb back up. Cant get anywhere without that first step or building a foundation. To use known examples newton. Then Einstein then hawking.

My entire life I've been used to indifference from the nonscience sector or people. At best they would ask some questions at worst their eyes would glaze over. What I wasn't used to is people picking fights or personal attacks. During covid I had almost daily encounters until I eventually gave up.

Yes. Please tell me again that you're mucho macho immune system will protect you when the 30 to 50 male demographic was hit the hardest.

The human genome project started in the 1990s and was partially completed in 2003 in which it identified 92% of our DNA sequences. It was only possible with the collaboration of many labs University and countries across the world. 6 billion base pairs in endlessly recombined chromosomes. In 2021 the telomere to telomere project "completed" it at 98%.

The delay was a combination of governments withdrawing funding, biotech private companies investment companies stepping in for funding (but needing a financial return), different measuring techniques and the non-existence of supercomputers.

There are still gaps, we don't know what most of it does, junk DNA is probably just dormant DNA, we can identify a few abnormalities and mutations but nothing related to any genetic heritage beyond grandparents. And almost nothing pertaining to phenotypes or geographic adaptation.  That's still the work of forensic anthropologist. (Bone structure).

In 2003 the entire genome of drosophila the Fruitfly was sequenced, easy to study, some scientist probably joked humans were fruitflies without wings the media ran with it and turned it into we share 99% with them. We don't. It's akin to claiming that just because my chair shares the same atoms as me; I'm a chair.

Where it is being used successfully is reclassifying living Animals. (More on that later).

Within 1000 years about 75% of DNA is completely gone. We barely have fragments left.

So. What we have right now is being called DNA profiling. It's possible to identify an individual and their closest relatives (siblings and parents), but that's it. If the idealized situation happens you get 50% from each of your parents, 25% from your grandparents, 12.5% from your great grandparents genetically speaking,  but there are dominant and recessive genes, how it all recombines is an unknown. At best there are 4 generations (80 years if each generation is 20 years), but not 10 generations or 200 years.

If there's further interest make sure you look at which century and decade something was published, who published it and what their background was.

Will there be technology in the future that will discover what we can't measure yet because we don't even know it exists? Yes.

The good news is, DNA degrades completely after 7 million years, so Dinosaurs are never coming back. Big sigh of relief.